top of page

PAPERS

This section includes working papers by members of the Sustasis Collaborative. Click on the image of each book or paper to open. 

​

We also have a selection of papers already published in journals, available here

 

Michael W. Mehaffy and Nikos A. Salingaros​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

LIVABLE PLACES AND GREEN MACHINERY

 

Rob Knapp

Emeritus Professor, Physics and Sustainable Design

The Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington, USA

Knapp - Livable Places and Green Machinery.jpg

A serious obstruction in the search for sustainable ways of life is the chasm that separates engineering and experience, or more precisely the engineering approach to low-impact buildings and the experience of thoroughgoing livability. Though much is known on both sides, about cost-effective, low-impact heating and cooling, for example, and about truly satisfying dwellings and workplaces, the professions of architecture, development and construction have generated few examples in which they come together. This paper tackles that challenge. Discussion of the nature of the problem leads to some possible patterns of the Alexander style which unite aspects of engineering and lived experience, and to three proposed approaches to finding more. 

Jenny Quillien​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

POUNDBURY: A DIFFERENT SET OF QUESTIONS

Quillien - Poundbury A Different Set of Questions.jpg

​

​What follows is a confession and an informal chronicling of some clumsy sleuthing on my part as I tried to come to grips with the making of livable cities. A heuristic insight was eventually obtained.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

THE COMPLEXITY-SYMMETRY (C-S) MODEL:

A framework for Evaluating and Generating Architectural Attractiveness

​

Mehaffy and Salingaros - Complexity-Symmetry Model - Working Paper - Feb 1 2026.jpg

A growing body of evidence indicates that many contemporary buildings are

widely perceived as unattractive or unsatisfying by their users, with documented

implications for psychological well-being, stress, and long-term attachment to place.

Despite these findings, architectural theory and practice have largely lacked a coherent

explanatory framework capable of accounting for robust, cross-cultural patterns in human

responses to the built environment. This paper addresses that gap by synthesizing recent

findings from environmental psychology, neuroscience, and complexity science with

established research on symmetry, perception, and aesthetic preference. Building on prior

theoretical work on structured complexity and multi-scale order, including contributions

by Nikos Salingaros, we propose the Complexity–Symmetry Model as a unified

framework for evaluating architectural attractiveness. The model posits that human

perceptual and cognitive systems preferentially respond to environments that exhibit

intermediate levels of complexity organized through compound symmetries—including

nested, broken, and hierarchical symmetries across multiple scales—rather than to either

monotonous uniformity or unstructured complexity. We advance the hypothesis that the

frequently observed preference for many traditional and pre-modern buildings is not

primarily attributable to nostalgia, age, or cultural familiarity, but instead to the presence

of these measurable geometric characteristics. To test this hypothesis, the paper reports

an empirical study in which participants rate the attractiveness of a curated set of

buildings, while those same buildings are independently evaluated using symmetry–

complexity metrics derived from the proposed model. The results demonstrate a

statistically significant correspondence between user evaluations and model predictions,

supporting the model’s explanatory and predictive validity. The paper concludes by

arguing that the systematic absence of these geometric properties in much contemporary

architecture represents not merely a stylistic divergence, but a missed opportunity for the

profession to align more closely with human perceptual and cognitive needs. Re-

engaging with complexity and symmetry as generative design principles offers a

promising pathway for enhancing architectural quality, livability, and professional

relevance in addressing the challenges of the built environment.

SUMMARY OF THE COMPLEXITY-SYMMETRY MODEL AND ITS FORMULAS FOR COMPUTATION

Michael W. Mehaffy (With consultation by Nikos A. Salingaros)​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Summary_of_the_Complexity-Symmetry_Model_and_its_Formulas_for_Computation.jpg

This short two-page summary is an "explainer" of the "complexity-symmetry model for architectural attractiveness. It explains the key elements and their formula elements, each of which goes into the algorithm for calculating the final result. The same methodology is used to generate results, using the methodology that is explained in the appendix to the full paper (shown above).  

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

FROM LOCK-IN TO IMPLEMENTATION:

Identifying Effective Pathways to Sustainable Urbanism

Michael W. Mehaffy​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

From Lock-in to Implementation - Draft Feb 1.jpg

Despite widespread agreement on the goals of sustainable urbanism, implementation remains

slow, fragmented, and politically fragile. Building on prior analysis of structural lock-in in

contemporary urban development, this paper shifts the focus from diagnosis to transition by

examining how sustainability-oriented change can occur within entrenched urban planning

systems. These systems—comprising regulatory frameworks, financial and valuation practices,

institutional procedures, governance arrangements, and cultural expectations—exhibit strong

path dependence that inhibits reform even where sustainability objectives are formally endorsed.

The paper conceptualizes urban development as governed by an implicit “operating system for

growth” and proposes a typology of implementation pathways capable of weakening lock-in

without requiring wholesale system replacement. These include code-adjacent regulatory

innovation, incremental economic realignment, procedural and institutional reform, and cultural

and perceptual reframing. Central to the framework is the role of public legitimacy and perceived

quality, articulated through the QUIMBY (“Quality In My Back Yard”) framework as a

stabilizing condition for durable transition. Together, these elements support an agile, user-

friendly approach to advancing sustainable urbanism through iterative, context-sensitive

implementation.

Call us:

503-250-4449

Find us: 

506 E. 9th Street, The Dalles, OR 97058

© 2021 by Sustasis Foundation. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page